Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade debug from 4.1.1 to 4.3.4 #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Johbrun
Copy link
Owner

@Johbrun Johbrun commented May 1, 2022

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade debug from 4.1.1 to 4.3.4.

merge advice
ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 6 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2022-03-17.
Release notes
Package name: debug
  • 4.3.4 - 2022-03-17

    What's Changed

    New Contributors

    Full Changelog: 4.3.3...4.3.4

  • 4.3.3 - 2021-11-27

    Patch Release 4.3.3

    This is a documentation-only release. Further, the repository was transferred. Please see notes below.

    Thank you to @ taylor1791 and @ kristofkalocsai for their contributions.


    Repository Migration Information

    I've formatted this as a FAQ, please feel free to open an issue for any additional question and I'll add the response here.

    Q: What impact will this have on me?

    In most cases, you shouldn't notice any change.

    The only exception I can think of is if you pull code directly from https://github.com/visionmedia/debug, e.g. via a "debug": "visionmedia/debug"-type version entry in your package.json - in which case, you should still be fine due to the automatic redirection Github sets up, but you should also update any references as soon as possible.

    Q: What are the security implications of this change?

    If you pull code directly from the old URL, you should update the URL to https://github.com/debug-js/debug as soon as possible. The old organization has many approved owners and thus a new repository could (in theory) be created at the old URL, circumventing Github's automatic redirect that is in place now and serving malicious code. I (@ Qix-) also wouldn't have access to that repository, so while I don't think it would happen, it's still something to consider.

    Even in such a case, however, the officially released package on npm (debug) would not be affected. That package is still very much under control (even more than it used to be).

    Q: What should I do if I encounter an issue related to the migration?

    Search the issues first to see if someone has already reported it, and then open a new issue if someone has not.

    Q: Why was this done as a 'patch' release? Isn't this breaking?

    No, it shouldn't be breaking. The package on npm shouldn't be affected (aside from this patch release) and any references to the old repository should automatically redirect.

    Thus, according to all of the "APIs" (loosely put) involved, nothing should have broken.

    I understand there are a lot of edge cases so please open issues as needed so I can assist in any way necessary.

    Q: Why was the repository transferred?

    I'll just list them off in no particular order.

    • The old organization was defunct and abandoned.
    • I was not an owner of the old organization and thus could not ban the non-trivial amount of spam users or the few truly abusive users from the org. This hindered my ability to properly maintain this package.
    • The debug ecosystem intends to grow beyond a single package, and since new packages could not be created in the old org (nor did it make sense for them to live there), a new org made the most sense - especially from a security point of view.
    • The old org has way, way too many approved members with push access, for which there was nothing I could do. This presented a pretty sizable security risk given that many packages in recent years have fallen victim to backdoors and the like due to lax security access.

    Q: Was this approved?

    Yes.[archive]

    Q: Do I need to worry about another migration sometime in the future?

    No.

  • 4.3.2 - 2020-12-09

    Patch release 4.3.2

    • Caches enabled statuses on a per-logger basis to speed up .enabled checks (#799)

    Thank you @ omg!

  • 4.3.1 - 2020-11-19

    Patch release 4.3.1

    • Fixes a ReDOS regression (#458) - see #797 for details.
  • 4.3.0 - 2020-09-19

    Minor release

    • Deprecated debugInstance.destroy(). Future major versions will not have this method; please remove it from your codebases as it currently does nothing.
    • Fixed quoted percent sign
    • Fixed memory leak within debug instances that are created dynamically
  • 4.2.0 - 2020-05-19

    Minor Release

    • Replaced phantomJS with chrome backend for browser tests
    • Deprecated and later removed Changelog.md in lieu of releases page
    • Removed bower.json (#602)
    • Removed .eslintrc (since we've switched to XO)
    • Removed .coveralls.yml
    • Removed the build system that was in place for various alternate package managers
    • Removed the examples folder (#650)
    • Switched to console.debug in the browser only when it is available (#600)
    • Copied custom logger to namespace extension (#646)
    • Added issue and pull request templates
    • Added "engines" key to package.json
    • Added ability to control selectColor (#747)
    • Updated dependencies
    • Marked supports-color as an optional peer dependency
  • 4.1.1 - 2018-12-22

    This backport fixes a bug in coveralls configuration as well as the .extend() function.

    Patches

from debug GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: debug

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants