-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handling complex numbers for PairwisePotential #655
Conversation
84f3d04
to
d1e54bf
Compare
0576459
to
88142d8
Compare
The tests may be a bit cryptic. Tell me if it may need more than some description of the steps. |
Is there an easy way to test for coverage without waiting for Github Actions? |
remove `kwargs` for `compute_forces`
Not really that I know of: you'd have to setup codecov locally I guess |
For this PR and others: can you mark the PRs as draft, and then mark it as finished when you want our review? Or indicate it in the issue or something. |
This one should be done. Coverage seems alright. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, thought I posted these thursday, but it went into a pending review...
Checks don't pass, but seems related to discussion with Niklass. Should be fine once merged to his version. |
Can be merged. |
No description provided.