Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling complex numbers for PairwisePotential #655

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Jun 28, 2022

Conversation

epolack
Copy link
Collaborator

@epolack epolack commented Apr 29, 2022

No description provided.

src/terms/pairwise.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@epolack epolack force-pushed the complex_pairwise branch 2 times, most recently from 0576459 to 88142d8 Compare May 3, 2022 15:25
@epolack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

epolack commented Jun 7, 2022

The tests may be a bit cryptic. Tell me if it may need more than some description of the steps.

@epolack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

epolack commented Jun 7, 2022

Is there an easy way to test for coverage without waiting for Github Actions?

@antoine-levitt
Copy link
Member

Not really that I know of: you'd have to setup codecov locally I guess

@antoine-levitt
Copy link
Member

For this PR and others: can you mark the PRs as draft, and then mark it as finished when you want our review? Or indicate it in the issue or something.

@epolack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

epolack commented Jun 8, 2022

This one should be done. Coverage seems alright.

src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/phonons.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/phonons.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/phonons.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/phonons.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/phonons.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@antoine-levitt antoine-levitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, thought I posted these thursday, but it went into a pending review...

src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@epolack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

epolack commented Jun 13, 2022

Checks don't pass, but seems related to discussion with Niklass. Should be fine once merged to his version.

@epolack epolack marked this pull request as draft June 16, 2022 09:17
@epolack epolack marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2022 09:17
test/phonons.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
src/terms/pairwise.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@epolack
Copy link
Collaborator Author

epolack commented Jun 28, 2022

Can be merged.

@antoine-levitt antoine-levitt merged commit e59df0e into JuliaMolSim:master Jun 28, 2022
@epolack epolack deleted the complex_pairwise branch October 14, 2022 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants