Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?
to your account
If the cell mentioned in equivalent_pins isn't there, the LVS script will stop. This function should be ignored if no cell/circuit with the given name is present.
Instead of using
equivalent_pins("ND2", "A", "B")
schematic.circuit_by_name("ND2") && equivalent_pins("ND2", "A", "B")
Nice to have BTW: "equivalent_pins" could appear before "schematic".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Merge pull request #357 from KLayout/issue-352
Fixed #352 (LVS should ignore equivalent_pins line for non-existing c…
No branches or pull requests