Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.26 LVS: equivalent_pins requires the cell to be present #352

Closed
klayoutmatthias opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

0.26 LVS: equivalent_pins requires the cell to be present #352

klayoutmatthias opened this issue Sep 11, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@klayoutmatthias
Copy link
Collaborator

@klayoutmatthias klayoutmatthias commented Sep 11, 2019

If the cell mentioned in equivalent_pins isn't there, the LVS script will stop. This function should be ignored if no cell/circuit with the given name is present.

Workaround:

Instead of using

equivalent_pins("ND2", "A", "B")

use

schematic.circuit_by_name("ND2") && equivalent_pins("ND2", "A", "B")

Nice to have BTW: "equivalent_pins" could appear before "schematic".

klayoutmatthias added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 16, 2019
Fixed #352 (LVS should ignore equivalent_pins line for non-existing c…
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant
You can’t perform that action at this time.