Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gg recid #86

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 21, 2019
Merged

gg recid #86

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 21, 2019

Conversation

omershlo
Copy link
Contributor

@omershlo omershlo commented Dec 6, 2019

No description provided.

@omershlo omershlo requested a review from oleiba December 6, 2019 04:55
@oleiba
Copy link
Contributor

oleiba commented Dec 8, 2019

2 small comments:

  1. Please make sure all Travis tests pass
  2. When updating to a new version, make sure you increment minor and not patch version (0.X.Y into 0.X+1.Y and not 0.X.Y+1) because it is a breaking change.

Cargo.toml Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[package]
name = "multi-party-ecdsa"
version = "0.2.8"
version = "0.3.8"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please make it 0.3.0, no need to keep the patch 8 here

@oleiba
Copy link
Contributor

oleiba commented Dec 9, 2019

I have mistakenly told you in previous command that 0.X.Y should be advanced to 0.X+1.Y.
It should be advanced to 0.X+1.0 (i.e. 0.3.0 in our case).

Cargo.toml Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[package]
name = "multi-party-ecdsa"
version = "0.3.8"
version = "0.2.9"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not 0.3.0?
It's a breaking change afaik... return type in an API function is different

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants