-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed invalid indexing of scalar datasets, and updated deprecated datset names #3
Conversation
Thanks for fixing this @mlouis9 . For the Kitware developers, I can confirm that the dataset name changes are correct. VERA used to accept several forms of input for certain datasets; it still accepts various names but always changes them to a standardized form, which is what @mlouis9 has used here. This is necessary to use VERACore with newer versions of VERA. For context: I'm the lead developer for VERA at ORNL now (https://www.ornl.gov/staff-profile/aaron-m-graham) and @mlouis9 explored VERACore as part of a summer internship project. |
Awesome! We'll push these changes forward.
…On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 9:12 AM Aaron Graham ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for fixing this @mlouis9 <https://github.com/mlouis9> . For the
Kitware developers, I can confirm that the dataset name changes are
correct. VERA used to accept several forms of input for certain datasets;
it still accepts various names but always changes them to a standardized
form, which is what @mlouis9 <https://github.com/mlouis9> has used here.
This is necessary to use VERACore with newer versions of VERA.
For context: I'm the lead developer for VERA at ORNL now (
https://www.ornl.gov/staff-profile/aaron-m-graham) and @mlouis9
<https://github.com/mlouis9> explored VERACore as part of a summer
internship project.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYGDMMNOBNM26NXVV3JEBLXOWG6DANCNFSM6AAAAAAZ7D74EU>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
@mlouis9 please don't forget to address the coding standard items ( |
The CI is complaining for some formatting. Just run black on the source to fix it
|
That should've fixed the formatting issues. The pre-commit run passes on my end. |
Great! Is this still work in progress or is good to go? The data set you
sent is great. Can we use it?
…On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:43 AM mlouis9 ***@***.***> wrote:
That should've fixed the formatting issues. The pre-commit run passes on
my end.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYGDMNYZ64Z2SF2F4UHQG3XPAAAJANCNFSM6AAAAAAZ7D74EU>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Yep, I can confirm; everything is ready. |
Updated dataset names to conform to VERA_4.3 naming conventions, and added additional logic to caching/uncaching to account for scalar datasets. The VERA_4.3 output file that these modifications were tested against (VERA progression problem: p9) can be found here.