Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JaCoCo Report Title #194

Closed
wakawaka54 opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #295
Closed

JaCoCo Report Title #194

wakawaka54 opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #295
Assignees
Labels
Feature Feature request issue type Kover Coverage Tool Kover DSL S: in progress Status: implementing or design in process
Milestone

Comments

@wakawaka54
Copy link

Great job so far on this! Working around JaCoCo + Kotlin has been a huge pain point for my team.

This is a relatively minor issue but it might be nice to be able to set the report title shown below. Right now its hardcoded to project.path, https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx-kover/blob/main/src/main/kotlin/kotlinx/kover/engines/jacoco/JacocoReports.kt#L45

image

@shanshin shanshin added Kover Coverage Tool Feature Feature request issue type Kover DSL labels Jul 7, 2022
@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

shanshin commented Jul 7, 2022

Before adding custom report header to the API, we will need to implement it in the IntelliJ Coverage Engine.

@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

shanshin commented Sep 8, 2022

Relates task

@shanshin shanshin added the S: in progress Status: implementing or design in process label Oct 27, 2022
@shanshin shanshin modified the milestones: Release 0.8.0, Release 0.7.0 Oct 27, 2022
@shanshin shanshin self-assigned this Oct 27, 2022
@shanshin
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolved in 0.7.0-Alpha

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature Feature request issue type Kover Coverage Tool Kover DSL S: in progress Status: implementing or design in process
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants