Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup JobSupport slightly #4079

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

Cleanup JobSupport slightly #4079

merged 9 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

dkhalanskyjb
Copy link
Collaborator

Before this change, there were some extra classes/interfaces that were immediately wrapped in other classes and so serve no real purpose. These classes are removed, slightly reducing the number of allocations in some cases and simplifying the code.

Follow-up to #4010

@dkhalanskyjb dkhalanskyjb force-pushed the dk-jobsupport-cleanup branch 3 times, most recently from 0c6c6e3 to c422fcd Compare April 4, 2024 12:36
Before this change, there were some extra classes/interfaces that
were immediately wrapped in other classes and so serve no real
purpose. These classes are removed, slightly reducing the number
of allocations in some cases and simplifying the code.
It's only used once during initialization, no need to store it if
we can explicitly pass it to the initialization sequence.
@dkhalanskyjb dkhalanskyjb merged commit 65ef6ea into develop Apr 9, 2024
1 check passed
@dkhalanskyjb dkhalanskyjb deleted the dk-jobsupport-cleanup branch April 9, 2024 09:06
Corje pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
This change simplifies some code used in for `JobSupport`:
there are fewer wrapper classes, the information is passed
between functions with less duplication, and some API was either
removed due to being unused, or moved to reduce its visibility.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants