Intial Governance #4
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
26 tasks
Signed-off-by: David Martin <davmarti@redhat.com>
david-martin
force-pushed
the
initial-governance
branch
from
975a359
to
7a96b6f
Compare
david-martin
commented
Jul 25, 2024
| Here are some examples of how decisions have been made in the past: | ||
|
|
||
| - discussing openly on the community slack channel | ||
| - a call with a specific group of people (like component specific maintainers or a 'de facto project lead') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| - a call with a specific group of people (like component specific maintainers or a 'de facto project lead') | |
| - a call with a specific group of people (like component specific maintainers) |
david-martin
commented
Jul 25, 2024
Comment on lines
+26
to
+39
| ### De facto project leads | ||
|
|
||
| Although the project doesn't have a lead person, there are a few people that have become de facto leads. | ||
| They would tend to be the most active on disucssions around roadmap items, releasing and generally on the community call. | ||
| They would also be the main people that others would look to for approval on changes. | ||
| The are: | ||
|
|
||
| - Alex Snaps [alexsnaps] | ||
| - Craig Brookes [maleck13] | ||
| - Eguzki Astiz Lezaun [eguzki] | ||
| - Guilherme Cassolato [guicassolato] | ||
|
|
||
| There are no set rules for how a person can move to a 'de facto project lead' role. | ||
| The existing list of people is subjective, based on who has been involved from the early stages of the project, and continues to be involved in the ways mentioned above. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| ### De facto project leads | |
| Although the project doesn't have a lead person, there are a few people that have become de facto leads. | |
| They would tend to be the most active on disucssions around roadmap items, releasing and generally on the community call. | |
| They would also be the main people that others would look to for approval on changes. | |
| The are: | |
| - Alex Snaps [alexsnaps] | |
| - Craig Brookes [maleck13] | |
| - Eguzki Astiz Lezaun [eguzki] | |
| - Guilherme Cassolato [guicassolato] | |
| There are no set rules for how a person can move to a 'de facto project lead' role. | |
| The existing list of people is subjective, based on who has been involved from the early stages of the project, and continues to be involved in the ways mentioned above. | |
| ### Project Lead | |
| At this time there is no concept of a project lead or leads. | |
| This may change in the future. |
After discussion on https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C05J0D0V525/p1721813274877239, I'm thinking we remove this section and have a discussion on what this means and how someone can be assigned this role.
|
I'm going to close this PR in favour of #5. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an attempt to capture some aspects of governance as they stand now.
I've based the sections on what's recommended in https://contribute.cncf.io/maintainers/governance/overview/