Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-evaluate the design and descriptions of tasks for a better understanding #159

Closed
AbdBarho opened this issue Dec 29, 2022 · 8 comments
Closed
Labels
design Images, icons, logos, styles, ... UI/UX All website Components website

Comments

@AbdBarho
Copy link
Collaborator

AbdBarho commented Dec 29, 2022

From comment #127 (review)

Consider adjusting the tasks' description and possibly design

For example, the rank_user_replies task currently shows different replies, but it does not show what is being replied to? critical context is missing.

Go through all tasks and evaluate whether a change is required and what:

  • Assistant reply & User reply
  • Rank Assistant replies & Rank User replies
  • Rank initial prompts
  • Summarize story & Rank summary (not part of MVP)
@AbdBarho AbdBarho added website design Images, icons, logos, styles, ... UI/UX All website Components labels Dec 29, 2022
@AbdBarho AbdBarho added this to the Minimum Viable Prototype milestone Dec 29, 2022
@yk
Copy link
Collaborator

yk commented Dec 30, 2022

yes you're right, there should be the entire thread up to that point so the rater knows the context of the replies they're asked to rank!

@AbdBarho
Copy link
Collaborator Author

AbdBarho commented Jan 2, 2023

Assistant reply & User reply

210204023-25594e51-8c55-4af9-be6a-860e75a0b16f

Currently the "speaker" is color coded, maybe it makes sense to add some text to show the speaker? Mockup (design could be better of course):

Screenshot 2023-01-02 084310

Maybe using tags and icons?

Screenshot 2023-01-02 085844

@yk
Copy link
Collaborator

yk commented Jan 2, 2023

only color-coding is not really suitable, because it needs a legend and potentially people with visual impairments could have trouble discriminating.

"User" is called "Prompter" to avoid confusion internally, but towards the actual user, idk what makes more sense.

I like the approach with avatars the most, maybe even avatars on different sides like many chat-apps

@othrayte
Copy link
Collaborator

othrayte commented Jan 2, 2023

I think avatars is the clearest and most representative of what the conversations actually look like, thus making it the clearest for a new user to understand.

For bonus points we could AI generate some avatars to represent the prompter (kindof a joke, but maybe a lower effort set of N pregenerated avatars wouldn't actually be too much work 😄 ).

@Jakolo121
Copy link
Contributor

We can use the "profile Picture" for the prompter. The prompter is already familiar with the Icon.
image

@fozziethebeat
Copy link
Collaborator

I like where this is going

@AbdBarho AbdBarho removed their assignment Jan 8, 2023
@fozziethebeat
Copy link
Collaborator

How are we on this issue? I feel like we haven't discussed this problem in a while so it's probably solved. @AbdBarho can you evaluate and close if appropriate?

@fozziethebeat
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm closing this as done, we've overhauled the tasks a lot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design Images, icons, logos, styles, ... UI/UX All website Components website
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants