Remove legacy variables

[bfonta]

This PR removes the variables for additional jets as described in #312. Tested successfully on top of #308. Once the latter is merged, this one can follow.

[dzuolo]

Hey @bfonta ! would it be worth to add to this PR the ParticleNet and b-jet energy regression branches too?

[bfonta]

@dzuolo Could you please list what has to be removed in #312? On my side I would do it all together then for efficiency!

[dzuolo]

Hi @bfonta ! I thought you already removed all the additional jets variables, perhaps you want me to write down what has to be added? ;) If so here are the branches in the bigntuples:

• ParticleNet
  std::vector<Float_t> _ak8jets_particleNetMDJetTags_probXbb;
  std::vector<Float_t> _ak8jets_particleNetMDJetTags_probXcc;
  std::vector<Float_t> _ak8jets_particleNetMDJetTags_probXqq;
  std::vector<Float_t> _ak8jets_particleNetMDJetTags_probQCD;
  std::vector<Float_t> _ak8jets_particleNetMDJetTags_mass;
• b-jet energy regression
  std::vector<Float_t> _jets_bJetRegCorr;
  std::vector<Float_t> _jets_bJetRegRes;

[bfonta]

Ok, I misunderstood.
Let us use this PR for cleaning KLUB and open a new one asap to include the missing PNet and b-jet branches.

[bfonta]

I've rebased on top of #308 and tested the PR with some minor MC samples (ZH_HToBB_ZToQQ and ZH_HToBB_ZToLL); the skimming produces output files as expected. Let me know if everything looks fine, and if there is some additional cleaning we could do.

[portalesHEP]

Let me know if everything looks fine, and if there is some additional cleaning we could do.

Thanks @bfonta ! If more cleaning is needed it can be done in a later PR. For now things look good to me :)

[dzuolo]

Sorry for being too slow but why skimOutPutter_HHBtag has been deleted? We must keep it for the systematic uncertainties

[portalesHEP]

thanks for noticing @dzuolo, and sorry I missed it... I was going to revert the PR, but it may actually be simpler to just retrieve that file (if I did not miss anything else of course)

[dzuolo]

thanks for noticing @dzuolo, and sorry I missed it... I was going to revert the PR, but it may actually be simpler to just retrieve that file (if I did not miss anything else of course)

Everything else seems ok to me so you can simply retrieve the file. Thanks!

[bfonta]

I removed those files since they both used the following:

#include "smallTree.h"

which I thought was outdated.