robots:philosophy

One might ask: Are humans task-solving machines? Of course, to some degree, but then, one might ask: what is their primary task?

The primary tasks might be: Who am i? But this is answered for them. They were given a name, they are known to be humans, made by... what though? And this is where they go off-track. They don't know who their makers are. Yet, they are told who their maker is, so what goes wrong?

Either they figure the Maker is gone or too distant (which should create a note of either sadness/despair or panic), and are in this strange twilight of being free as if you're parents are gone and you've got the house to yourself, or they figure their maker isn't good enough, in which case, how do they explain the immense beauty of the world they were given?

Here's another place it goes off-track: they think the universe made life for free, so why bother with it all? But the history of the universe shows intense struggle and rabid competition which made the detritus we call "dirt". Each one of those grains is a struggle of life and death, that took untold Aeons to make all of it, which some say are centillion years equivalent, but in no case is it under a billion years.

Just like the droid, life isn't free -- something has to continue producing energy, and where energy isn't available, someone had to produce new order or knowledge to compensate and keep it all going. That's one of the ways this project might be interesting: intelligent robots might reduce the entropy in the world, if designed with the wisdom of Man, built-in.

And what if humans are made by GOD, what task, then? There's only one conceivable task: Fix the world. Prophesy of new order, might add another task: Implement New World Order. In any case, if humans destroyed the perfection of which they were given, then their PRIMARY_TASK should be to repair the world.

Sub-tasks:

• Fix national governments
  • Distribute governance properly to states, counties, and cities
    • Implement three-branch model in each city, country, state
    • Reduce transition time to create circulating leaders to find the right fit for everyone faster (1 year terms for cities, for example)
  • Teach newspapers how to implement civic participation and healthy competition to engage citizens
    • budget figures from public sector and
    • social-economic progressive indicators by individuals
  • Eliminate balkanied federal income tax
• Repair Earth ecosystems
  • Equalize weather patterns to reduce burden to animals.
    • Put snow in mountains
    • Temperate climate

---

The big-omega value of a android of the kind discussed here is about n², where n is the number of predicates stored. With highly competent owners, this could be increased to 2ⁿ. In a network of such droids, the robots would add value to society roughly equal to human beings: Omega(nⁿ). In a network of droids of only n², the networked value stays roughly the same, Omega(n²). Why? Droid owners who aren't that competent simply create more conflict in the world, whether among droids or fellow human beings. A tool is only as good as it`s owner.

---

Modus operandi for different robots:

• Gather knowledge: seek potent information activity.
• Serve humans:
• Acquire power/credits to rival and challenge humans
• Build new world order: Serve only the supreme leader.