-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moderators can configure pool- and project-formation algorithms using the CLI #82
Comments
Open UX Issues
|
@tannerwelsh LMK if this works as a starting-point for UX work. Ideally, I'd like to provide something like this for everything that is "ready for UX". LMK if something else would work better. |
Suggestions from Game Mechanics: Pool configurationThe moderator passes a pool threshold config file to
For example the config file could define:
Project configurationOnce votes are in the Moderator launches the cycle For example, the team threshold config file could dictate:
This means that a player with an ELO rating less than 1000 cannot be assigned as an advanced player to a team. A player with an ELO rating of 1150 can be an advanced player on upto 3 concurrent projects. |
Proposed moderator UI/UX for configuration. Tried to keep the subcommands straightforward and easy to type, remember, and parse. |
I would strongly prefer a command that just takes a URL param that points to a yaml file (we could even add param to
Moderators could use a git gist to host the file which would allow them to reuse configs from cycle to cycle and even track changes. |
Roger that @bundacia. I'll update the design with a URL input instead. Starting to feel like doing any command-based UI design work is comically useless. I agree that pointing to a YAML file is a "better" way to get the data into the system than the design above, and it is also one more glaring hack. Looking forward to designing towards fewer hacks. |
Yeah, it's a huge hack. The hackishness is mitigated a little bit in this case by this being a moderator-only command, so at least we're not negatively affecting the UI for the players and it contributes toward this benefit:
Since this will effectively allow the moderator/game-design to tweak the team formation algorithm in real time. |
...sorry if i missed it, but why wouldn't we do this as a form in a web app (flex panel)? no matter what the moderator interface is, the system still has to be able to identify and process specific inputs, so it offers no less flexibility for the moderator than a config file or strictly command line interface would. and it would seem to be the clear winner in terms of usability. |
And what a YAML-file URL provision interface would look like:
|
So, we have 3 options on the table, each with their pluses and minuses.
Given that the primary stakeholder is one person, and there are two potential implementers, the questions that remain are: |
neither the web form nor config file approach is trivial from an implementation standpoint. and at a glance, the config file parsing approach is not significantly less expensive to implement than a gui form. there are far more things that could go wrong because of constraints in the ui being necessarily implicit with a command line + config file interface than with a web form w/ validated input fields. the command line + cli input also asks the end user to remember more, to manage storing the file in an accessible place (public, or else we have to deal with authorization depending on where it's stored) and to generally work much harder to provide the expected input. my strong gut sense is that a web form, with some iteration on @tannerwelsh's initial mockup (great start, btw!) is a better solution. |
oh, and there is another option (cheaper and less usable in the long run) - these settings could live in a YAML file within the game repo itself, and @shereefb could just modify that file directly and submit PRs against the codebase. |
no. 3 is probably the most expensive in terms of implementation (by what i think is not a prohibitively greater amount than the config option), but i believe it'll yield the greatest value in the end both for the moderator in terms of ease of use and for engineering in terms of ease of support/maintenance. it also gives us more room for iteration on the ux. there's a limit to how complex a strictly CLI approach (no. 1) can get before it's not worth bothering with. i think we're already just about at that limit, so there's no room to make the interface able to handle more complex input. no. 2 saves us some time perhaps in initial implementation but asks a lot of the moderator. whether or not it's too much only @shereefb can say. |
@tannerwelsh, @shereefb: another thing to consider is that in a few weeks, @shereefb ain't gonna be the only moderator on the floor. i think we'll wanna raise the priority of moderator usability for both our sake and theirs. : ) |
@tannerwelsh: thoughts on web form mockup... |
The web interface is nice, but I think it would definitely be more work than just fetching a file-based config, and it makes adding new config options a little harder (with a YAML file there are zero UI changes to add options). The YAML file allows us to iterate really fast on tweaking the algorithm which I think is a high priority for @shereefb in his game mechanics role. |
If the web UI were done reasonably well :), this should be true for it, too. see: survey UI. it could allow for fast iteration on the very same kinds of changes. |
Ok so @shereefb I think we need some more clarity from you then to make this decision:
|
My strong sense is that this just a temporary hack so that we can experiment with different ways of forming the pools. After a few weeks of experimenting (ideally before November cohort starts) this should all be automated. I think we should optimize for quick, cheap implementation that will get thrown away soon and replaced by algorithm, and we should assume that myself or @tannerwelsh are the only two users for this interim step. my 2 cents: changing a config file directly in the code base would be fine. |
thanks, @shereefb. if we're going with the config file-in-codebase-option, there's no work to be done here in |
Issue moved to LearnersGuild/game #432 via ZenHub |
Overview
As per LearnersGuild/echo#418, the moderator needs a way to configure the pool- and project-formation algorithms. Each of these algorithms has a different relationship to Elo rankings.
The suggestion from game mechanics was two configuration "files" to be passed to
cycle init
andcycle launch
commands. However, uploading files to echo would be difficult to support in a clean way. Engineering suggested the alternative of configuration URLs rather than files.OND: it seems to me that one configuration file with different sections would be superior, and perhaps a moderator-only command to update the configuration makes the most sense.
Command / Arguments
View full configuration
moderator only
Configure voting pools
Set concurrent projects limit
Help messages
Top-level command
Example subcommand
Configuration Format
Arguments to command. No file upload.
Feedback to Moderator
--help
/config
or/config get [opts]
Player Visibility of Configuration
Not visible. Voting pools and concurrent project limits may be made visible through other means.
/config
command is only accessible to a moderator.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: