Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare HC Annotations with Azimuth Results #12

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
lahuuki opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Compare HC Annotations with Azimuth Results #12

lahuuki opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lahuuki
Copy link
Member

lahuuki commented Aug 11, 2022

  • Upload and run on Azimuth Human Motor cortex app
  • Compare with current HC annotations, use to help annotate Excit layers
@lahuuki
Copy link
Member Author

lahuuki commented Aug 17, 2022

image
Use Azimuth annotations as "guide" to split and further annotate clusters (not merge as we previously thought). Recreate this heatmap map with annotations for: number of 1vALL marker genes (specifically groups with none), best layer + max layer correlation value. Maybe annotate Azimuth cell types by our broad classifications.

co-authored w/ @lcolladotor

lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2022
lahuuki added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2022
@lcolladotor
Copy link
Member

lcolladotor commented Aug 30, 2022

We are updating this one to:

Summary heatmap

- [ ] Update number of marker genes results from #7 (comment) on the y-axis. Although maybe we'll drop this: let's talk about it.
- [ ] Update with number of nuclei by hc on the y-axis
- [ ] Update with number of nuclei by Azimuth on the x-axis

Preliminary clusters

https://github.com/LieberInstitute/DLPFC_snRNAseq/blob/main/plots/05_explore_sce/06_explore_azimuth_annotations/azimuth_v_prelim-Excit_02.png and related ones. We'll put them together into a multi-panel supplementary figure.

  • Actually, I think it might be best to have them as a single heatmap so the columns are all in the same order, but labeling on the y-axis which hc cluster they come from.

While we won't split the hc clusters based on this, we can mention these observations in case others want to split the hc clusters later.

Known markes across Azimuth

Violin plots of known markers. I think this is what's already at https://github.com/LieberInstitute/DLPFC_snRNAseq/blob/main/plots/05_explore_sce/06_explore_azimuth_annotations/Azimuth_basic_mathys_markers.pdf. But maybe there's another similar PDF.

  • Extract some highlights to show why the results from Azimuth have some issues themselves. We'll also mention on the text that L1 and L4 are missing in motor cortex.

@lcolladotor
Copy link
Member

For the number of marker genes, I know that you weren't too enthused with how pheatmap binarizes the continues metric into a color range with 4 values. With that in mind, maybe ComplexHeatmap would be more useful where we can add a barplot on the side like at https://jokergoo.github.io/ComplexHeatmap-reference/book/heatmap-annotations.html

@lcolladotor
Copy link
Member

@lahuuki I think we can close this one, right?

@lahuuki lahuuki closed this as completed Feb 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants