-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove -rs suffix from the crate name #9
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- src/lib.rs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (8)
src/lib.rs (8)
10-16
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [13-32]
Consider implementing
Index
foru8
andu64
.Implementing the
Index
trait for additional integer types such asu8
andu64
could enhance the flexibility and usability of the library, especially for applications that may benefit from smaller or larger index sizes.
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Refine the documentation for
Earcut::new
.The documentation for
Earcut::new
could be enhanced by providing more details about the initial state of theEarcut
instance and how it's intended to be used in the context of polygon triangulation.
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Use
Vec::with_capacity
inEarcut::new
for performance.Consider initializing the
Vec
fields inEarcut::new
with a predefined capacity usingVec::with_capacity
to potentially reduce the number of reallocations during the triangulation process, especially if an approximate upper bound of the required capacity can be estimated based on typical use cases.
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Clarify the role of
Earcut::reset
.The
Earcut::reset
method's purpose and usage could be more clearly documented. Specifically, it would be helpful to explain when and why a user might need to reset anEarcut
instance, and what the implications are for the instance's internal state.
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Consider adding unit tests for
Earcut
functionality.The PR introduces significant functionality with the
Earcut
struct. Adding unit tests could help ensure the correctness of the implementation and facilitate future maintenance. Would you like assistance in creating these tests?
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Optimize
Earcut::earcut
for large datasets.The
Earcut::earcut
method could be optimized for handling large datasets. For example, consider using more efficient data structures for spatial queries or parallelizing parts of the algorithm that can be executed independently.
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Ensure consistent error handling.
The current implementation of
Earcut::earcut
and related methods does not explicitly handle errors or invalid input. Consider adding error handling mechanisms to provide clear feedback to users about issues with their input data.
109-117
: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Validate input data in
Earcut::earcut
.Before processing, validate the input data in
Earcut::earcut
to ensure it meets the expected format and constraints. This could prevent unexpected behavior or errors during the triangulation process.
} | ||
|
||
impl<T: Float> Earcut<T> { | ||
/// Creates a new instance for the earcut algorithm. | ||
/// Creates a new instance of the earcut algorithm. | ||
/// | ||
/// You can reuse the same instance for multiple triangulations to reduce memory allocations. | ||
/// You can reuse a single instance for multiple triangulations to reduce memory allocations. | ||
pub fn new() -> Self { | ||
Self { | ||
data: Vec::new(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]
Review the use of unsafe
in macros node
and node_mut
.
The use of unsafe
in the node
and node_mut
macros for unchecked indexing could lead to undefined behavior if indices are out of bounds. Consider adding bounds checks or documenting the conditions under which these macros are guaranteed to be safe.
5606306
to
ac3e12f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- benches/benchmark.rs (1 hunks)
- examples/example.rs (1 hunks)
- src/lib.rs (4 hunks)
- tests/fixture.rs (1 hunks)
- tests/simple.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Cargo.toml
- src/lib.rs
Additional comments not posted (4)
examples/example.rs (1)
1-1
: The update of the import statement fromearcut_rs
toearcut
correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!benches/benchmark.rs (1)
5-5
: The update of the import statement fromearcut_rs::Earcut
toearcut::Earcut
correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!tests/fixture.rs (1)
1-1
: The update of the import statement fromearcut_rs
toearcut
for thedeviation
andEarcut
modules correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!tests/simple.rs (1)
1-1
: The update of the import statement fromearcut_rs
toearcut
for thedeviation
andEarcut
modules correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!
ac3e12f
to
5bde7fa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- benches/benchmark.rs (1 hunks)
- examples/example.rs (1 hunks)
- src/lib.rs (4 hunks)
- tests/fixture.rs (1 hunks)
- tests/simple.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/example.rs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- Cargo.toml
- benches/benchmark.rs
- src/lib.rs
- tests/fixture.rs
- tests/simple.rs
5bde7fa
to
4703d92
Compare
https://crates.io/crates/earcut