Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove -rs suffix from the crate name #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2024
Merged

Remove -rs suffix from the crate name #9

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2024

Conversation

ciscorn
Copy link
Member

@ciscorn ciscorn commented Apr 7, 2024

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd24643 and c28b87f.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • src/lib.rs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (8)
src/lib.rs (8)

10-16: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [13-32]

Consider implementing Index for u8 and u64.

Implementing the Index trait for additional integer types such as u8 and u64 could enhance the flexibility and usability of the library, especially for applications that may benefit from smaller or larger index sizes.


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Refine the documentation for Earcut::new.

The documentation for Earcut::new could be enhanced by providing more details about the initial state of the Earcut instance and how it's intended to be used in the context of polygon triangulation.


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Use Vec::with_capacity in Earcut::new for performance.

Consider initializing the Vec fields in Earcut::new with a predefined capacity using Vec::with_capacity to potentially reduce the number of reallocations during the triangulation process, especially if an approximate upper bound of the required capacity can be estimated based on typical use cases.


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Clarify the role of Earcut::reset.

The Earcut::reset method's purpose and usage could be more clearly documented. Specifically, it would be helpful to explain when and why a user might need to reset an Earcut instance, and what the implications are for the instance's internal state.


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Consider adding unit tests for Earcut functionality.

The PR introduces significant functionality with the Earcut struct. Adding unit tests could help ensure the correctness of the implementation and facilitate future maintenance. Would you like assistance in creating these tests?


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Optimize Earcut::earcut for large datasets.

The Earcut::earcut method could be optimized for handling large datasets. For example, consider using more efficient data structures for spatial queries or parallelizing parts of the algorithm that can be executed independently.


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Ensure consistent error handling.

The current implementation of Earcut::earcut and related methods does not explicitly handle errors or invalid input. Consider adding error handling mechanisms to provide clear feedback to users about issues with their input data.


109-117: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Validate input data in Earcut::earcut.

Before processing, validate the input data in Earcut::earcut to ensure it meets the expected format and constraints. This could prevent unexpected behavior or errors during the triangulation process.

Comment on lines 109 to 117
}

impl<T: Float> Earcut<T> {
/// Creates a new instance for the earcut algorithm.
/// Creates a new instance of the earcut algorithm.
///
/// You can reuse the same instance for multiple triangulations to reduce memory allocations.
/// You can reuse a single instance for multiple triangulations to reduce memory allocations.
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {
data: Vec::new(),
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [98-114]

Review the use of unsafe in macros node and node_mut.

The use of unsafe in the node and node_mut macros for unchecked indexing could lead to undefined behavior if indices are out of bounds. Consider adding bounds checks or documenting the conditions under which these macros are guaranteed to be safe.

@ciscorn ciscorn force-pushed the remove-rs-suffix branch 2 times, most recently from 5606306 to ac3e12f Compare April 7, 2024 05:12
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd24643 and 5606306.
Files selected for processing (6)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • benches/benchmark.rs (1 hunks)
  • examples/example.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/lib.rs (4 hunks)
  • tests/fixture.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/simple.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • Cargo.toml
  • src/lib.rs
Additional comments not posted (4)
examples/example.rs (1)

1-1: The update of the import statement from earcut_rs to earcut correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!

benches/benchmark.rs (1)

5-5: The update of the import statement from earcut_rs::Earcut to earcut::Earcut correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!

tests/fixture.rs (1)

1-1: The update of the import statement from earcut_rs to earcut for the deviation and Earcut modules correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!

tests/simple.rs (1)

1-1: The update of the import statement from earcut_rs to earcut for the deviation and Earcut modules correctly reflects the crate's new name and aligns with the PR's objectives. LGTM!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd24643 and ac3e12f.
Files selected for processing (6)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • benches/benchmark.rs (1 hunks)
  • examples/example.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/lib.rs (4 hunks)
  • tests/fixture.rs (1 hunks)
  • tests/simple.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • examples/example.rs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
  • Cargo.toml
  • benches/benchmark.rs
  • src/lib.rs
  • tests/fixture.rs
  • tests/simple.rs

@MIERUNE MIERUNE deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Apr 7, 2024
@ciscorn ciscorn merged commit 0923060 into main Apr 7, 2024
1 check passed
@ciscorn ciscorn deleted the remove-rs-suffix branch April 7, 2024 05:29
@ciscorn ciscorn self-assigned this Apr 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant