Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 24, 2022. It is now read-only.

162 ci crashes #163

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 14, 2015
Merged

162 ci crashes #163

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 14, 2015

Conversation

JPrevost
Copy link
Member

@JPrevost JPrevost commented Apr 9, 2015

This will likely not work, but what the heck.

Updates sbt, scala, jdbc (not oracle even if my commit not mentions that... it's still posgresql), play and re-enables coverage.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 2319e9c on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling d3b101c on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 626291b on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 8b50938 on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 47292ef on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling bf9f90d on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@JPrevost
Copy link
Member Author

@richardrodgers just confirming... you are okay with this updated dependencies branch merging now, or would you prefer to wait until your current work is in?

I prefer merging this, but don't need it if it conflicts with anything you are working on.

@richardrodgers
Copy link
Collaborator

No, it's fine to merge now.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 7296816 on 162_ci_crashes into * on master*.

@JPrevost
Copy link
Member Author

closes #162 (hopefully)

JPrevost added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2015
@JPrevost JPrevost merged commit 0f1977c into master Apr 14, 2015
@JPrevost JPrevost deleted the 162_ci_crashes branch April 14, 2015 17:33
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants