Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Hasura support or compatibility #3496

Closed
rrjanbiah opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Hasura support or compatibility #3496

rrjanbiah opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
C-feature Category: new feature or request
Milestone
0.6

Comments

@rrjanbiah
Copy link

Already posted to Hasura hasura/graphql-engine#4307

Not sure who has to implement. But, seems to have great potential as Hasura on plain PostgreSQL is not suitable for all cases.
@rrjanbiah rrjanbiah added the C-feature Category: new feature or request label Jun 30, 2020
@quodlibetor
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your interest in this! We are very interested in hasura compatibility overall, related issues for hasura support are #2772 (which has a great comment explaining our current compat) and we need to support some large subset of pg_catalog #2157 , which we still have lots of work to do to support.

@awang awang added this to the 0.5 milestone Aug 7, 2020
@awang awang modified the milestones: 0.5, 0.6 Aug 24, 2020
@cuongdo
Copy link
Contributor

cuongdo commented Sep 9, 2020

#4150 provides more detail regarding what's needed for Hasura support

@rrjanbiah rrjanbiah mentioned this issue Sep 10, 2020
Open
@awang awang closed this as completed Sep 10, 2020
@awang
Copy link
Contributor

awang commented Sep 10, 2020

Closing this issue in favor of #4150, as it has more details

@rrjanbiah rrjanbiah mentioned this issue Jun 1, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C-feature Category: new feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.6
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@awang @quodlibetor @cuongdo @rrjanbiah