Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

redo of #18737 #18817

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2023
Merged

redo of #18737 #18817

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 18, 2023

Conversation

sploiselle
Copy link
Contributor

redo of #18737 to see if I can break through some caching issue

Motivation

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered.
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • This PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way) and therefore is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • This PR includes the following user-facing behavior changes:

@sploiselle sploiselle requested a review from a team as a code owner April 18, 2023 14:57
@sploiselle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Setting to automerge piggy backing off of approval of #18737

@sploiselle
Copy link
Contributor Author

We are incompatible with pgtest in some number of ways > 0; filed #18820 to unblock this work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants