Skip to content

Cloud Computing assignment of a scalable WebApp through Traefik, ShinyProxy and Docker Swarm mode

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

MatteoFasulo/ScalableWebApp

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

65 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

ScalableWebApp

Overview

Target

Build a scalable architecture using sotftware virtualization (Docker) and container orchestration (Docker Swarm / Kubernetes).

Architecture

The following image represents the architecture proposed as well as the services implemented on Manager and Worker nodes.



Master Node(s)

The master node implements the following services:

Worker Nodes

Worker nodes will run only the WebApp chosen by user.

Services

A deep dive into the services used so everyone can understand why we used such services.

  • First of all since all the architecture is based on Docker (Docker Swarm in this case) you might wondering why we chose Traefik over Nginx or Apache as Web Server. Well, this is mainly due to the ease of set up of Traefik. If you have ever configured Nginx you know what I'm talking about. Nginx settings can end up in huge config maps that are hard to read and manage especially in case of many redirects and rules. Also Traefik will handle the renewal of TLS certificates with Let's Encrypt automatically.
  • You might also wondering why Docker Swarm compared to standard Docker containers (with Docker Compose paradigm).
    • Firstly the Swarm mode is already implemented in Docker Engine so you do not have to install it separetly like docker-compose.
    • Moreover Swarm mode allows you to scale your service just by adding nodes to the swarm and quicky empower all your architecture.
    • Docker-compose lacks of functions that Swarm manages like secret-information storage, auto-recovery of services, rollbacks and healthchecks that in a production evniroment are a must.
    • Docker Swarm implements the same docker-compose.yml syntax for services.
  • Why ShinyProxy?
    • Since our initial WebApp was a Shiny App we needed an environment that could host a Shiny App. If you are not familiar with shiny you can skip this part. At the current state of art there are three ways of hosting a Shiny App:
      • Shinyapps.io - a cloud based free hosting service with no hardware installation or annual purchase contract required.
      • Shiny Server - open source server to host multiple shiny apps even behind firewall.
      • RStudio Connect - commercial on-premises solution to host Shiny applications, R Markdown reports, dashboards and plots, as well as Python-based content, including Flask, Dash, Streamlit and Bokeh.
    • The open source version of Shiny Server has several limitations, including a maximum of 1 R worker thread per application. That feature is not scalable by design, so since our web app involved training a model, we decided to use ShinyProxy (a more scalable and comprehensive solution). Based on Java Spring boot and Docker, ShinyProxy allows you to scale ShinyProxy WebApps by associating a Docker WebApp container to each user, effectively isolating each instance of your app from the others. Also since ShinyProxy is a full-fledged WebServer, we can create containers with different Web Apps (whether they are written in R or Python) and the mechanism will be exactly the same, ShinyProxy will start a new container every time a user launches one of these Web Apps regardless of whether they are Shiny or Python Web Apps. The only precautions will be to create a container for each Web App to be published and to associate a unique identifier to each user in order to be able to distinguish two users who connect to ShinyProxy (guaranteed through the authentication mechanisms like AWS Cognito in this case or any other OAuth based authentication system e.g KeyCloak)
  • Grafana and InfluxDB
    • ShinyProxy natively supports usage statistics monitoring with InfluxDB, a time-series database which in combination with Grafana allows you to monitor performance in near real time. The idea behind InfluxDB is to use a time-series database that stores a large amount of data. To avoid weighing down the database, InfluxDB implements retention policies in order to eliminate the oldest data and make room for the new ones. Grafana, on the other hand, allows you to create dashboards with graphs that call the underlying database. This allows you to monitor the status of all services and the current workload.
  • Telegraf
    • We have implemented Telegraf service for collecting and sending all metrics and events from Docker Swarm to Grafana monitor. Thanks to that we are allowed to make system telemetry.

About

Cloud Computing assignment of a scalable WebApp through Traefik, ShinyProxy and Docker Swarm mode

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages