Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an api for giving local-dynamo more heap #23

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2015
Merged

Add an api for giving local-dynamo more heap #23

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2015

Conversation

nicks
Copy link
Contributor

@nicks nicks commented Jun 22, 2015

Hello @kylehg, @chaosgame,

Please review the following commits I made in branch 'nick-api'.

61beeba (2015-06-22 15:04:14 -0700)
Add an api for giving local-dynamo more heap

R=@kylehg
R=@chaosgame

Test plan: 'not tested'

@kylehg
Copy link
Contributor

kylehg commented Jun 22, 2015

Oh nice, I didn't know you could do this — I suspect this could've saved us a good bit of trouble before

* An options object:
* port: {number} - The port to run on. Required.
* dir: {?string=} - The location of database files. Optional Will run in-memory if null.
* heap: {?string=} - The amount of heap space, e.g., 512m. If not specified, uses JVM defaults.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe link to something indicating more info about the format of this option, e.g., http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5374455/what-does-java-option-xmx-stand-for

@kylehg
Copy link
Contributor

kylehg commented Jun 22, 2015

LGTM!

@nicks
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicks commented Jun 22, 2015

more docs added!

nicks added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2015
Add an api for giving local-dynamo more heap
@nicks nicks merged commit 28ee0a4 into master Jun 22, 2015
@nicks nicks deleted the nick-api branch June 22, 2015 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants