Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Operator runner improvements #128

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jfrost-mo
Copy link
Member

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo commented Jun 19, 2023

A whole mix of various improvements and fixes.

Fixes #127

This is needed to allow adding dummy arguments that only exist to chain other
operators to run as sub-steps. An example of this is when wanting to produce
output both as a NetCDF file, and a plot.
This more closely matches the actual usage, and tests sub-step behaviour.
@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2023 16:17
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Coverage

@jfrost-mo jfrost-mo added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 19, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Sylviabohnenstengel Sylviabohnenstengel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good and welcome back **kwargs :-)

@Sylviabohnenstengel Sylviabohnenstengel merged commit b802e3e into main Jun 20, 2023
@Sylviabohnenstengel Sylviabohnenstengel deleted the operator-runner-improvements branch June 20, 2023 08:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Readd **kwargs to operators
2 participants