-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue141 2nd try #144
Issue141 2nd try #144
Conversation
I need to test a little more... but this might do it. |
Added some patches, and it looks like it does the right thing now. I asked the client to test. |
As noted by @reidsunderland we still have some multi-threading vulnerabilities... perhaps best to address. will review. |
The multithreading stuff is quite big... in volume... it basically means getting rid of all variables declared static as there is always a race condition when called by multiple threads. I think it's better to have a separate branch for that (maybe more than one.) and merge this stuff (already >600 loc.) as is for now. It likely solves the user's problem as-is. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm good with merging this and fixing the other stuff separately
close #141
Had to change global variables into pieces of context passed to library routines... a lot of changes, but that's all it did.