Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompatHelper: bump compat for LossFunctions to 0.9, (keep existing compat) #195

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request changes the compat entry for the LossFunctions package from 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 to 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@MilesCranmer MilesCranmer force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2023-04-19-00-08-57-244-01229756550 branch from 164127f to f798f23 Compare April 19, 2023 00:09
…-244-01229756550

[Diff since v0.16.3](v0.16.3...v0.17.0)

**Closed issues:**
- troubles in pysr.install() (#196)

**Merged pull requests:**
- Multiple refactors: arbitrary data in `Dataset`, separate mutation weight conditioning, fix data races, cleaner API (#190) (@MilesCranmer)
- CompatHelper: bump compat for DynamicExpressions to 0.6, (keep existing compat) (#194) (@github-actions[bot])
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

Benchmark Results

master 9b8cc26... t[master]/t[9b8cc26...]
search/multithreading 57.3 ± 1.4 s 59.1 ± 1.7 s 0.969
search/serial 0.0175 ± 1.9e-05 h 0.0168 ± 0.00019 h 1.04
time_to_load 18.1 ± 0.22 s 19.3 ± 0.77 s 0.937

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR.
Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).

@MilesCranmer
Copy link
Owner

Skipping in favor of #203

@MilesCranmer MilesCranmer deleted the compathelper/new_version/2023-04-19-00-08-57-244-01229756550 branch May 8, 2023 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant