Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce mina_block package instead of mina_transition #10903

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 10, 2022

Conversation

georgeee
Copy link
Member

@georgeee georgeee commented May 9, 2022

This PR rearranges module structure and finalizes block header/body split work.

Explain how you tested your changes:

  • Existing suite is used to prevent regressions
  • No change to functionality is made

Checklist:

  • Modified the current draft of release notes with details on what is completed or incomplete within this project
  • Document code purpose, how to use it
    • Mention expected invariants, implicit constraints
  • Tests were added for the new behavior
    • Document test purpose, significance of failures
    • Test names should reflect their purpose
  • All tests pass (CI will check this if you didn't)
  • Serialized types are in stable-versioned modules
  • Does this close issues? Separate block headers from block bodies in OCaml #9455

@georgeee georgeee requested review from a team as code owners May 9, 2022 17:21
@georgeee georgeee added the ci-build-me Add this label to trigger a circle+buildkite build for this branch label May 9, 2022
@georgeee georgeee merged commit 6343618 into compatible May 10, 2022
@georgeee georgeee deleted the georgeee/mina-block-package branch May 10, 2022 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-build-me Add this label to trigger a circle+buildkite build for this branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants