Add links for download Apache Royale 0.9.6

[piotrzarzycki21]

We need to add newest Apache Royale release to our installer. All links for download can be found here

[rat-moonshine]

Does Moonshine SDK Installer also deployed to you somewhere in Moonshine website as Moonshine-IDE compilation does (at Bamboo), @piotrzarzycki21 ?

[piotrzarzycki21]

Does Moonshine SDK Installer also deployed to you somewhere in Moonshine website as Moonshine-IDE compilation does (at Bamboo), @piotrzarzycki21 ?

Nope

[rat-moonshine]

Yeah, I see that.. We probably need to have the deployment added to the plan also. For now, here's the link for your tests:
https://spaces.hightail.com/space/dhMpju9MTw

[piotrzarzycki21]

Please add that changes to CHANGELOG

[piotrzarzycki21]

I know that is an enhancement, but I think we should display somewhere version of SDK which we are providing for download.

[piotrzarzycki21]

It doesn't have to as part of this update of course.

[rat-moonshine]

I have updated the CHANGELOG.

I think somewhere in old mockups there were a version figure in layouts. You can open a separate ticket for this, we shall look into that.

[JoelProminic]

I am getting a lot of errors like this with the Royale Browser Templates in Moonshine after the update:

: /Users/-user-/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml(129): col: 0 Error: unable to open '/Users/-user-/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js/royale-asjs/frameworks/libs/Basic.swc'.
: /Users/-user-/Downloads/MoonshineSDKs/Royale_SDK/apache-royale-0.9.6-bin-js/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml (line: 129)
:       </library-path>

It looks like this issue is already being discussed: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/Broken-royale-config-in-JS-only-build-of-released-Apache-Royale-SDK-0-9-6-td12515.html

@piotrzarzycki21's fix worked for me: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/Broken-royale-config-in-JS-only-build-of-released-Apache-Royale-SDK-0-9-6-td12515.html#a12543

Do we want to apply this fix automatically with Moonshine SDK Installer, or is there a fix planned for the Royale SDK?

[piotrzarzycki21]

Well I'm not sure whether from the license perspective we can do such things and provide SDK. I saw commit from Alex - it should be fixed now I nightly. I need to think whether I'm ready for release struggle again ;)

[JoelProminic]

I don't mean downloading the AIR SDK - I think we have discussed this in the past, but I don't immediately remember what we decided for this. Rather, I mean commenting out the entries in royale-config.xml. Is this a problem when we are providing the JS-only version?

[piotrzarzycki21]

This is what I mean. I don't know whether we can do that and provide changed SDK. :) I will ask on dev on Sunday.

[JoelProminic]

What I had in mind was using the official ZIP file, but running a script afterwards to remove the lines that broke the builds (assuming they are not needed for anything else). If this is a problem with the license, then we may want to review the current behavior - I think that are adding executable file permissions to royale-asjs/bin and royale-asjs/js/bin

[piotrzarzycki21]

What I had in mind was using the official ZIP file, but running a script afterwards to remove the lines that broke the builds (assuming they are not needed for anything else). If this is a problem with the license, then we may want to review the current behavior - I think that are adding executable file permissions to royale-asjs/bin and royale-asjs/js/bin

Ohh... That's also great idea. @rat-moonshine what do you think about that ?

[JoelProminic]

@piotrzarzycki21, after talking with @rat-moonshine, there were some points I wanted to clarify:

• Is this a general bug with the Royale SDK that will affect all users?
• If this is not a general SDK bug, what is special about our templates? Should we fix the templates instead?
• Are you working on deploying another release for the SDK to fix this? If so, when is this expected to be ready? If it is soon, then it may be overkill to implement a fix in Moonshine SDK Installer

[piotrzarzycki21]

@piotrzarzycki21, after talking with @rat-moonshine, there were some points I wanted to clarify:

• Is this a general bug with the Royale SDK that will affect all users?
• If this is not a general SDK bug, what is special about our templates? Should we fix the templates instead?
• Are you working on deploying another release for the SDK to fix this? If so, when is this expected to be ready? If it is soon, then it may be overkill to implement a fix in Moonshine SDK Installer

1. Yes it affects all Royale users who use JS-only build
2. I saw commits from Alex related to that problem, so it may be fixed already. Even if I start working on releasing another version I think it takes at least 1 week to finish whole process. I didn't start yet.

[piotrzarzycki21]

Guys Alex suggested similar solution to your @JoelProminic . Let's go with that direction and we will be good with licensing. @rat-moonshine can you look into that ? I think implementation should be on Installer sight.

[rat-moonshine]

Since the purpose of this issue have met, I'm creating a separate issue #17 to follow-up the patch-fix to Royale SDK. Please, let's discuss relevant things to that issue.