Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AsyncTargetWrapper - Do not schedule lazy writer timer, when other active writer #3790

Merged

Conversation

snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor

@snakefoot snakefoot commented Feb 3, 2020

Trying to resolve #3789. Hard to write an unit-test as it is hard to reproduce (Not even sure it is the issue).

@snakefoot snakefoot added this to the 4.7 milestone Feb 3, 2020
@snakefoot snakefoot added the enhancement Improvement on existing feature label Feb 3, 2020
@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

Could we reproduce it locally?

@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor Author

snakefoot commented Feb 4, 2020

Could we reproduce it locally?

Not anywhere near the thread-amount that the issue showed. It is probably similar to #3412

@snakefoot snakefoot force-pushed the AsyncTargetWrapperThrottleTimer branch from d9ad202 to 3b39716 Compare February 4, 2020 06:16
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 4, 2020

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities (and Security Hotspot 0 Security Hotspots to review)
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

83.3% 83.3% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

OK, I think we should merge it as it won't hurt any way? Or do you like to wait for a confirmation?

@snakefoot
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it should just be merged. Since all evidence was lost (would really have liked to see the internal logger output) and apparently not easy to re-produce.

@304NotModified 304NotModified merged commit 11a5765 into NLog:master Feb 4, 2020
@304NotModified
Copy link
Member

merged 👍 thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement on existing feature size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants