You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Variable names were inconsistent. Fluxes from both soil & groundwater storages were named as primary_flux and secondary_flux in the main execusion vs. primary_flux**_m** and secoundary_flux**_m** in conceptual_reservoir_flux_calc.
As a result, the baseflow was entirely missing in CFE. Fluxes calculated in conceptual_reservoir_flux_calc were not passed the main flux calculation.
Change needed
Change variable name 'primary_flux' to 'primary_flux_m'
Change variable name 'secondary_flux' to 'secondary_flux_m'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RY4GIT
changed the title
Variable name is wrong
Variable name is wrong: in the result baseflow is not generated
Apr 5, 2023
RY4GIT
changed the title
Variable name is wrong: in the result baseflow is not generated
Variable name is wrong; in the result baseflow is not generated
Apr 5, 2023
This issue is identified in PR #60 and #63
Current behavior
Variable names were inconsistent. Fluxes from both soil & groundwater storages were named as primary_flux and secondary_flux in the main execusion vs. primary_flux**_m** and secoundary_flux**_m** in conceptual_reservoir_flux_calc.
As a result, the baseflow was entirely missing in CFE. Fluxes calculated in conceptual_reservoir_flux_calc were not passed the main flux calculation.
Change needed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: