You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some post processing is implemented to index cross-tabulated counts by unique values in candidate map (rows) and benchmark map (columns).
No ability to keep track of candidate or benchmark attributes or process parameters is in place.
Expected behavior
The above structure is great for readability but does not account for the various hierarchies of samples including sub-samples, band/features, maps, and catalogs.
A contingency table structure is required that reports cross-tabulated counts for each sample as well as their associated attributes.
Methods to aggregate/groupby crosstab counts by level or associated attributes is important.
Ways of melting and pivoting this structure to something more human readable like a cross-tabulation table indexed by unique values in candidate map (rows) and benchmark map (columns) would be nice to have as well.
Some method of tagging each column with metadata is necessary. Current metadata source (candidate, benchmark, or process) and hierarchy (catalog, map, band/feature, sub-sample).
fernando-aristizabal
changed the title
Implement categorical contingency statistics table.
Allow for attributes within categorical contingency tables.
Mar 7, 2023
fernando-aristizabal
changed the title
Allow for attributes within categorical contingency tables.
Create categorical contingency table data structure
Mar 7, 2023
Implement a standard schema for contingency table structure.
This issue depends on #38.
Current behavior
Expected behavior
The above structure is great for readability but does not account for the various hierarchies of samples including sub-samples, band/features, maps, and catalogs.
A contingency table structure is required that reports cross-tabulated counts for each sample as well as their associated attributes.
Methods to aggregate/groupby crosstab counts by level or associated attributes is important.
Ways of melting and pivoting this structure to something more human readable like a cross-tabulation table indexed by unique values in candidate map (rows) and benchmark map (columns) would be nice to have as well.
Some method of tagging each column with metadata is necessary. Current metadata source (candidate, benchmark, or process) and hierarchy (catalog, map, band/feature, sub-sample).
What data structures are necessary to account for this?
What classes should be created for this?
Screenshots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: