-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test-time augmentation: noise, blur, brightness, contrast, geometric scaling, etc. #106
Comments
That's true for satellite imagery. But since brightness and contrast shifts are only histograms modifications, there are a few considerations:
It's worth the discussion, tough. I think the first step would be to test the first hypothesis and work from there. I'll add this to our "tests wishlist". Math |
Augmentration techniques should be reviewed (noise, blur, geometric scaling, etc.). Overall, there could be a slight improvement of results if different augmentation strategies were tested. For example, test-time augmentation could be interesting to try out. This paper deserves a look: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 Edited June 25th 2020: |
This implementation good be a good start: |
Wouldn't trained models gain robustness if data augmentations (utils/augmentation.py) included brightness and contrast shifts (ex.: random, 10-15%)? I imagine it could also help with overfitting issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: