[v2][_commonspeckle] for xpcs_timepixel.py is there anything we can learn from this or should we delete

[ambarb]

@afluerasu said this was just a test of the detector to see what worked and that this is not used at CHX

Is there anything we can learn from this module to make the others more generic?

Should we set aside this module for future implementations of the LBNL TimePix for soft x-rays?

[ambarb]

not deleting because using timepix for quantum.

@danielballan suggest to find the day this file was created and compare to chx_correlationp.py or chx_correlationc.py to see if we just need to get IO and put somewhere so we can interface.

[danielballan]

This is a bigger mess than I had anticipated. The copy-pasting was not a one-time event, but rather a habit that spanned over multiple years. There are no short-cuts here other than line-by-line comparing each function.

[danielballan]

(I had thought this split was the result of a one-time rush to make a specific experiment work that just never got cleaned up.)