Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perf with JMH #837

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 9, 2014
Merged

Perf with JMH #837

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 9, 2014

Conversation

abersnaze
Copy link
Contributor

#776 This is a small change on top of perf with Caliper to performance benchmarking with JMH.

@abersnaze
Copy link
Contributor Author

Example output of the same timings done in #788


Benchmark                                  Mode Thr     Count  Sec         Mean   Mean error    Units
r.o.ObservableBenchmark.timeBaseline      thrpt   1        20    1      557.493       12.025   ops/ms
r.o.ObservableBenchmark.timeMap           thrpt   1        20    1      374.152        3.968   ops/ms
r.o.ObservableBenchmark.timeMapIterate    thrpt   1        20    1     2389.195       42.686   ops/ms

BUILD SUCCESSFUL

Total time: 2 mins 5.172 secs

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

RxJava-pull-requests #758 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2014
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit e07d341 into ReactiveX:master Feb 9, 2014
@benjchristensen benjchristensen deleted the perf_jmh branch February 9, 2014 00:29
@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

Thanks, I look forward to seeing our perf testing mature in this project.

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

Related to #776

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants