Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add Paris release spec class for completeness #6633

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

Add Paris release spec class for completeness #6633

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

LukaszRozmej
Copy link
Member

Changes

  • Adds paris class

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce?

  • Bugfix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (a change that causes existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Optimization
  • Refactoring
  • Documentation update
  • Build-related changes
  • Other: Description

Testing

Requires testing

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, did you write tests?

  • Yes
  • No

smartprogrammer93
smartprogrammer93 approved these changes Jan 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@smartprogrammer93 smartprogrammer93 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Who doesn't like Paris fork. The question is, shouldn't we change IsPostMergeTo be based on the merge block number instead of what we have now?

@LukaszRozmej
Copy link
Member Author

IsPostMergeTo

Would have to add it to all network information, including chainspec, still want to keep transition logic to offer transitioning to existing networks, that are still on other consensus engines.

@LukaszRozmej LukaszRozmej merged commit 4090798 into master Feb 2, 2024
67 checks passed
@LukaszRozmej LukaszRozmej deleted the feature/add-paris-spec branch February 2, 2024 12:27
kamilchodola pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
@LukaszRozmej @kamilchodola
Add Paris release spec class for completeness (#6633)
7918aff
kamilchodola added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
@MarekM25 @smartprogrammer93
@marcindsobczak @benaadams @rubo @kamilchodola @LukaszRozmej
Refactoring (#6635)
d819ea2 
* Resolved conflicts

* max body size for http json rpc (#36)

* Format

* Self-recovery of TxPool max capacity

* fix ProcessedTransactionsDbCleanerTests

* Update txPool worst value if removal unsuccessful (#6702)

(cherry picked from commit f262cb2)

* Clearer error message for missing starting block state (#6672)

* Update txPool worst value if removal unsuccessful (#6702)

* Add Cancun hard-fork settings for Gnosis (#6709)

* Cancun spec and config for mainnet (#6679)

* Add Paris release spec class for completeness (#6633)

* 0.0.0.0 to +

---------

Co-authored-by: smartprogrammer <smartprogrammer@windowslive.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcin Sobczak <marcindsobczak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Adams <thundercat@illyriad.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Buniatyan <rubo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Bitar <33181301+smartprogrammer93@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kamil Chodoła <kamil@nethermind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lukasz Rozmej <lukasz.rozmej@gmail.com>
kamilchodola added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
@MarekM25 @smartprogrammer93
@marcindsobczak @benaadams @rubo @kamilchodola @LukaszRozmej
Refactoring (#6635)
a58b64d 
* Resolved conflicts

* max body size for http json rpc (#36)

* Format

* Self-recovery of TxPool max capacity

* fix ProcessedTransactionsDbCleanerTests

* Update txPool worst value if removal unsuccessful (#6702)

(cherry picked from commit f262cb2)

* Clearer error message for missing starting block state (#6672)

* Update txPool worst value if removal unsuccessful (#6702)

* Add Cancun hard-fork settings for Gnosis (#6709)

* Cancun spec and config for mainnet (#6679)

* Add Paris release spec class for completeness (#6633)

* 0.0.0.0 to +

---------

Co-authored-by: smartprogrammer <smartprogrammer@windowslive.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcin Sobczak <marcindsobczak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Adams <thundercat@illyriad.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Buniatyan <rubo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Bitar <33181301+smartprogrammer93@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kamil Chodoła <kamil@nethermind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lukasz Rozmej <lukasz.rozmej@gmail.com>
kamilchodola added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
@MarekM25 @smartprogrammer93
@marcindsobczak @benaadams @rubo @kamilchodola @LukaszRozmej
Refactoring (#6635)
3b8f5c0 
* Resolved conflicts

* max body size for http json rpc (#36)

* Format

* Self-recovery of TxPool max capacity

* fix ProcessedTransactionsDbCleanerTests

* Update txPool worst value if removal unsuccessful (#6702)

(cherry picked from commit f262cb2)

* Clearer error message for missing starting block state (#6672)

* Update txPool worst value if removal unsuccessful (#6702)

* Add Cancun hard-fork settings for Gnosis (#6709)

* Cancun spec and config for mainnet (#6679)

* Add Paris release spec class for completeness (#6633)

* 0.0.0.0 to +

---------

Co-authored-by: smartprogrammer <smartprogrammer@windowslive.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcin Sobczak <marcindsobczak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Adams <thundercat@illyriad.co.uk>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Buniatyan <rubo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahmad Bitar <33181301+smartprogrammer93@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kamil Chodoła <kamil@nethermind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lukasz Rozmej <lukasz.rozmej@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rubo rubo rubo approved these changes

@MarekM25 MarekM25 MarekM25 approved these changes

@smartprogrammer93 smartprogrammer93 smartprogrammer93 approved these changes

@Demuirgos Demuirgos Demuirgos approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@LukaszRozmej @rubo @MarekM25 @smartprogrammer93 @Demuirgos