Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Rollup merge of rust-lang#109408 - RalfJung:retags, r=compiler-errors
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
not *all* retags might be explicit in Runtime MIR

In rust-lang#105317 I made Miri treat `Rvalue::Ref/AddrOf` as implicit retagging sites. This updates the MIR docs accordingly.

For `Rvalue::Ref` I think this makes a lot more sense: creating a new reference is their entire point, so we can avoid bloating the MIR with retags. Also this seems to be the best way to handle cases like `*ptr = &[mut] ...`, where doing a retag is somewhat questionable since maybe `*ptr` points to another place now?

For `Rvalue::AddrOf`, Stacked Borrows needs this because even raw ptrs need some retagging, but Tree Borrows doesn't do ant retagging here and I hope we'll end up with a model where raw pointers don't get retagged.
  • Loading branch information
Noratrieb authored Mar 21, 2023
2 parents b2e48ed + 5058cc8 commit 925fbcd
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/syntax.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ pub enum MirPhase {
/// MIR, this is UB.
/// - Retags: If `-Zmir-emit-retag` is enabled, analysis MIR has "implicit" retags in the same way
/// that Rust itself has them. Where exactly these are is generally subject to change, and so we
/// don't document this here. Runtime MIR has all retags explicit.
/// don't document this here. Runtime MIR has most retags explicit (though implicit retags
/// can still occur at `Rvalue::{Ref,AddrOf}`).
/// - Generator bodies: In analysis MIR, locals may actually be behind a pointer that user code has
/// access to. This occurs in generator bodies. Such locals do not behave like other locals,
/// because they eg may be aliased in surprising ways. Runtime MIR has no such special locals -
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 925fbcd

Please sign in to comment.