Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
haskell: drop package sets for GHC 6.12.x, 7.0.x, 7.2.x, 7.4.x, and 7…
….6.x These old package sets have been broken and unmaintained for a long time now.
- Loading branch information
Showing
6 changed files
with
0 additions
and
535 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
94 changes: 0 additions & 94 deletions
94
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-ghc-6.12.x.nix
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
85 changes: 0 additions & 85 deletions
85
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-ghc-7.0.x.nix
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
89 changes: 0 additions & 89 deletions
89
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-ghc-7.2.x.nix
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
117 changes: 0 additions & 117 deletions
117
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-ghc-7.4.x.nix
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @peti this broke master's evaluation, causing other PRs to fail checks: https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/39b7e79e5ad5e6e024d04e244c375790 note your original PR also failed these checks, a red ❌ means an actual problem now :)
should
be deleted?
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it shouldn't, we still have JHC in tree. It seems that now JHC is broken, unless it works with newer GHC versions.
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thank you so much for being so fast :D
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@peti:
pkgs/top-level/haskell-packages.nix
stills refers to GHC 6.x, 7.0.x, 7.2.x (but not to package sets). Is that intended?eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, we're seeing infinite recursion in the haskell code:
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's intended. We'll keep the compilers around for now.
@grahamc, that evaluation error is unrelated to this commit. The
scalendar
package is broken, because upstream publishes incorrect dependencies.eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@peti can you hop on IRC sometime to help me sort this out?
eb0da3e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.