electrum: make compatible with protobuf 4+

[prusnak]

Description of changes

• fixes electrum: fails to build on x86_64 #193997

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[austinbutler]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 194112 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:

• electrum

[oxalica]

Doesn't is just hide the existing issue? It's intentional to mark as not supporting protobuf 4. spesmilo/electrum#7922

[prusnak]

Doesn't is just hide the existing issue? It's intentional to mark as not supporting protobuf 4. spesmilo/electrum#7922

Not really. Upstream wants to keep old pb2.py file to support older protobuf. We regenerate the pb2.py file to new version, because we don't care about older protobuf.