hwdata: 0.360 -> 0.363

[iblech]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[iblech]

Note: This change may be affected by NixOS/nix#6572.

nix-shell -I nixpkgs=... -p hwdata correctly produces the expected files in /nix/store/acgi1g8vkllzmlhvi8kla0n0qga853hk-hwdata-0.363, however it warns build input /nix/store/5w9wnk36rx4ycyg2p7hf034yviphk9x2-hwdata-0.363 does not exist and pciutils for instance requires the files to be in the latter location instead of the former.

I don't know how to debug this.

[LunNova]

This probably needs to target staging due to the mass rebuild.

[iblech]

Awesome, thank you for tending to this pull request, @SuperSandro2000!

I can confirm that building hwdata and pciutils work correctly and without warnings. (I don't quite understand why it didn't work as a FOD, even though it had been that way for quite some time.)