python311Packages.bash-kernel: rename from bash_kernel

[mweinelt]

Description of changes

Part of #245383

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[natsukium]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 266657 at 403a240 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built successfully:

• python310Packages.bash-kernel
• python311Packages.bash-kernel

---

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 266657 at 403a240 run on aarch64-darwin 1

2 packages built successfully:

• python310Packages.bash-kernel
• python311Packages.bash-kernel

[thomasjm]

Hi all, I have a question here --

Is there a reason this PR removed the patch https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/takluyver/bash_kernel/pull/69.diff ?

I see that some other patch was applied to the same area. (And there might have been some upstream changes there too.) But I'm experiencing a breaking with this package and I think it's because that patch was removed.