Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ipam: init at 0.3.0-1 #274943

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024
Merged

ipam: init at 0.3.0-1 #274943

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

Janik-Haag
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

Adding the cli based ipam, called ipam

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Copy link
Contributor

@katexochen katexochen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 274943 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • ipam

Builds, works. License needs to be fixed. We could also add an update script and version test, but this is optional.

pkgs/by-name/ip/ipam/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/ip/ipam/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@katexochen katexochen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks. :)

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/1320

@katexochen katexochen merged commit 7e2688a into NixOS:master Feb 28, 2024
23 checks passed
@Janik-Haag Janik-Haag deleted the ipam branch February 28, 2024 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants