-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
python311Packages.spsdk: 2.0.1 -> 2.1.0 #289865
Conversation
This doesn't fix the build. Please build stuff before stating it fixes something. Result of 6 packages failed to build:
|
ebd59c1
to
07b3ba9
Compare
07b3ba9
to
8bb68c1
Compare
8bb68c1
to
4adbdb3
Compare
Result of 6 packages marked as broken and skipped:
10 packages built:
|
This does not seem to fix the build of |
That might be a flaky test. Please re-run. |
Does not seem to be a flaky test, just re-ran it 20 times, all of which failed consistently (also added to https://gist.github.com/marzipankaiser/821e5f20cee2098310b5b6382565f779 ) It might be performance-related, though 🤔 |
Using Here's the build log: https://gist.github.com/999eagle/19f3bca701091abf84eadd37430f88d3 EDIT: Huh. Interestingly enough, |
Result of 4 packages marked as broken and skipped:
12 packages built:
|
Indeed, I run 6.1 on my build server and I can reproduce the failure on kernel 6.7. |
pytestCheckHook | ||
voluptuous | ||
]; | ||
|
||
disabledTests = [ | ||
"test_nxpcrypto_create_signature_algorithm" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also this should get a short comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't care enough about these packages to figure out why the test fails.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need to figure out why but we should at least comment how they failed, otherwise we can't determine in the future, if things got fixed or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't you just run the test and see if it still fails?
''; | ||
|
||
disabledTests = [ | ||
"test_diff_to_string" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should also get a short comment
"test_inline_merge_cells_replacement" | ||
"test_interrogate_filter_no_repo" | ||
"test_merge_input_strategy_inline" | ||
"test_git_diffdriver" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should add a short comment if we update the failed test list
699c68b
to
9e37aaf
Compare
Now that #288357 is available on |
Result of 4 packages marked as broken and skipped:
12 packages built:
|
Not sure this should've been merged yet as the build still hangs on the tests in |
Before this PR spsdk was broken so this definitely doesn't make the situation worse. |
Description of changes
fixes #289860
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.