-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vibrantlinux: 2.1.10 -> 2.2.0 #304265
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
vibrantlinux: 2.1.10 -> 2.2.0 #304265
Conversation
5857f8b
to
4bc1e9a
Compare
ey! I just opened GitHub after a bit. |
No pressure ^^ There also won't be many more updates to the software for the foreseeable future, so it's fairly low maintenance anyway :D |
4bc1e9a
to
ecb1e7b
Compare
ecb1e7b
to
f07233b
Compare
17bb480
to
c95a402
Compare
c95a402
to
ccf30c2
Compare
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4364 |
Signed-off-by: Sefa Eyeoglu <contact@scrumplex.net>
Signed-off-by: Sefa Eyeoglu <contact@scrumplex.net>
Signed-off-by: Sefa Eyeoglu <contact@scrumplex.net>
a77a9f3
to
fd0fb2e
Compare
Description of changes
Upgrades to the recently released vibrantLinux and libvibrant versions.
I (upstream developer) have switched vibrantLinux to CMake and did some big refactorings to improve the overall code quality and fix some issues. This software now also starts on systems that are not supported, with a user-friendly message telling them about the problem.
libvibrant now ships a pkg-config manifest to improve the packaging process of that.
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.