Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt a new naming scheme to better allign with upstream: #5113

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

magnetophon
Copy link
Member

faustCompiler is just the compiler, faustTools will be the build scripts
plus environment, and faust will contain both.

faustCompiler is just the compiler, faustTools will be the build scripts
plus environment, and faust will contain both.
@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Nov 24, 2014

We avoid upper case in names (and in attribute names as well), even if used by upstream. http://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#idm140737319201904 Therefore, faust-compiler should be better. However, both Debian and Fedora call this just faust...

@magnetophon
Copy link
Member Author

The complete NixOS package will be called faust too, but internally it'll be using faust-compiler.

Reason:

faust has quite a lot of optional dependencies, see http://faust.grame.fr/index.php/documentation/references/12-documentation/reference/52-arch-files-reference-art
Most people will only use a subset of these, so people on irc suggested I make two packages.
The other package will depend on this one, and have (most of) the rest of it's dependencies optional.

@vcunat vcunat closed this in 0168c1b Nov 24, 2014
@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Nov 24, 2014

Ah, sure. I only saw one faust-related package in nixpkgs, so that confused me.

@magnetophon magnetophon deleted the faustCompiler branch June 6, 2020 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants