babashka: 0.0.71 -> 0.0.78

[bhougland18]

Motivation for this change

Add new package to repository. This is a small command line utility that allows one to use a subset of the clojure programming language in their shell commands.

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • other Linux distributions
• Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
• Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/trouble-with-creating-first-nix-package/6479/4

[AndersonTorres]

Why is it failing the Borg?

[bennyandresen]

Maybe the location should be pkgs/development/interpreters/clojure/babashka.nix instead of pkgs/tools/misc/babashka/default.nix?

Anyway: looking forward to this package!

[bennyandresen]

the spelling of this maintainer is DerGuteMoritz

[bennyandresen]

Not sure why eval fails by borg, but for me this PR builds fine and works as expected.

@mmilata @AndersonTorres

[bhougland18]

Not sure why eval fails by borg, but for me this PR builds fine and works as expected.

@mmilata @AndersonTorres

I am currently using the software as well, works fine.

[bennyandresen]

I would really like to see the latest babashka in NixOS, I would like to propose the following:

I resubmit a new PR, basically re-doing #83886 with the, I think, proper location of pkgs/development/interpreters/clojure/babashka.nix, based on master. I would use this PR's meta.description and meta.longDescription.

This PR has all its commits removed sans adding @bhougland18 to the maintainer list which can get merged then.
Then I will add @DerGuteMoritz, @bhougland18 & myself to the maintainers of this package in my new PR, so we can all keep an eye on new releases, graalvm updates affecting the package, etc.

Can we agree on this course of action @AndersonTorres and @bhougland18?

[bhougland18]

I agree with this course of action. This is my first commit and I really don't know where to go from here as I don't understand why it is failing.

…

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:14 AM Benjamin Andresen ***@***.***> wrote: I would really like to see the latest babashka in NixOS, I would like to propose the following: I resubmit a new PR, basically re-doing #83886 <#83886> with the, I think, proper location of pkgs/development/interpreters/clojure/babashka.nix, based on master. I would use this PR's meta.description and meta.longDescription. This PR has all its commits removed sans adding @bhougland18 <https://github.com/bhougland18> to the maintainer list which can get merged then. Then I will add @DerGuteMoritz <https://github.com/DerGuteMoritz>, @bhougland18 <https://github.com/bhougland18> & myself to the maintainers of this package in my new PR, so we can all keep an eye on new releases, graalvm updates affecting the package, etc. Can we agree on this course of action @AndersonTorres <https://github.com/AndersonTorres> and @bhougland18 <https://github.com/bhougland18>? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#83776 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGZANCAT6HZWOGLJ2V7JW33RKWZJJANCNFSM4LWS3FTA> .

[AndersonTorres]

OK for me.

In fact I was uploading a new diff for it now.

P.S.: I am a bit puristic, and I would like to ast two things:

• Is it hard to compile directly from sources, instead of using a JAR file?
• Can it be renamed as "babashka-jar"?

[AndersonTorres]

"Superceded" by #84284