Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make coreutils build on osx 10.0.8 #902

Closed

Conversation

danieroux
Copy link
Contributor

@Phreedom
Copy link
Member

Phreedom commented Sep 2, 2013

hrm intersting.
@vcunat this changes stdenv on osx, on the other hand this implies that stdenv is broken so it's' kinda ok to change right away. thoughs?

@danieroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am very good and screwing up version numbers on OSX (not my native environment):

  • My Mac is: 10.7.5 build 11G63b
  • The patch on the coreutils mailing list is for 10.8.0 and it fixed my problem on 10.7.5

@lovek323
Copy link
Member

lovek323 commented Sep 5, 2013

Maybe I'm missing something, but I've had no trouble getting coreutils and gettext to build on my Darwin system (10.8).

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Sep 6, 2013

Oh, I somehow missed this request. It looks like some impurity (some compilers/libs going through OK). It was accepted upstream, so I see no problem with it. It's a stdenv rebuild for darwin, but I agree it's fit for master straightaway (I'll restrict it to cause no rebuilds on other platforms).

One more thing before pushing: is it still the case that coreutils-8.21 don't build on darwin and we have to use 8.19?

vcunat pushed a commit to vcunat/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2013
Take patch from: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2013-01/msg00119.html
vcunat edit: don't affect other platforms (befor stdenv-update), some style refactoring.
@danieroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

coreutils-8.21 builds on my darwin (after the necessary fiddling in all-packages)

@danieroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lovek323 10.7.5 seems to be the difference here. gcc-core-4.6.3 also doesn't build for me - still looking at the cause for that.

@danieroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vcunat @lovek323 I have a new/better? way to solve this for me: #939

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Sep 14, 2013

I suppose this is obsolete now, otherwise reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants