Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for EIP-2930 transactions in eth_call request resolution #255

Closed
Tracked by #303
Wodann opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #303

Add support for EIP-2930 transactions in eth_call request resolution #255

Wodann opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Wodann
Copy link
Member

Wodann commented Dec 13, 2023

Currently, eth_call can only resolve requests to EIP-155 or EIP-1559 transactions to match Hardhat's behaviour. It should however also support EIP-2930 transactions.

Definition of Done
Add support for resolution of an eth_call request to an EIP-2930 transaction

@Wodann Wodann added this to EDR Dec 13, 2023
@Wodann Wodann converted this from a draft issue Dec 13, 2023
@Wodann Wodann moved this from Unconfirmed to Todo in EDR Dec 13, 2023
@Wodann Wodann added this to the EDR v0.3.0 milestone Dec 13, 2023
@alcuadrado
Copy link
Member

I believe those should only be used in two cases:

  1. When you are running Berlin and an access list is provided.
  2. When running >= London and an access list and gasPrice is provided.

@Wodann
Copy link
Member Author

Wodann commented May 10, 2024

Resolved by NomicFoundation/hardhat#4746

@Wodann Wodann closed this as completed May 10, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in EDR May 10, 2024
@Wodann Wodann removed this from the EDR v0.5.0 milestone May 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants