Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade node-rest-client from 3.1.0 to 3.1.1 #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

merge advice

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:debug:20170905
No No Known Exploit
low severity 399/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 3.7
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
npm:ms:20170412
No No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: node-rest-client The new version differs by 7 commits.
  • 18edf68 increment version after pull request merge
  • 0e240d2 Merge pull request #213 from JL102/master
  • 4ed21bc Merge pull request #158 from konczak/master
  • 634a2a5 Update dependencies
  • e75400e fix Buffer deprecation
  • 81ce763 Test script: Set iplist/blacklist encoding
  • ae00403 Update readme.md

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant