-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 400
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
9.0 move crm department #77
Conversation
(lp:c2c-addons/6.1 rev 2)
(lp:c2c-addons/6.1 rev 5)
(lp:c2c-addons/6.1 rev 28.2.1)
…e reactivated when the modules are migrated
…to the employee is determined.
Removed department determination from sales team. Determination only occurs from employee.
…ation determines the section (sales team) and based on that, the department that the sales team is assigned to. If the sales team does not have an associated department the department of the employee of the salesperson is used.
forgot to uncomment form view
move description from __openerp__.py to README.rst
crm_department/README.rst
Outdated
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/badge/licence-AGPL--3-blue.svg | ||
:alt: License: AGPL-3 | ||
|
||
CRM with Department Categorization |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
line before
Sorry, completely forgot about this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 non blocking points
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | |||
# Translation of OpenERP Server. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove POT file
crm_department/README.rst
Outdated
:target: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html | ||
:alt: License: AGPL-3 | ||
|
||
CRM with Department Categorization |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line above also
@danimaribeiro Can you recheck, please? |
Hi @dreispt could you please review runbot, I will test it in order to merge. Thanks! |
Hey @dreispt, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
I forced a rebuild. |
And the rebuild is lagged and stalled |
Runbot rebuild doesn' work. I have green CI. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm! 👍
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
/ocabot merge nobump |
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
@dreispt your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 9.0-ocabot-merge-pr-77-by-dreispt-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
Incorporates the discussion in PR OCA/department#49