Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[13.0][FIX] ddmrp: buffer profiles must be no-update #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2021

Conversation

LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow commented Jun 8, 2021

Any change in the profiles is overridden when updating the module.
Also this trigger the recomputation of the buffer zones, as
they depend on buffer profile changes, this is unwanted.

CSV data does not support no-update tag so the date is converted to xml.

cc @jgrandguillaume

@ForgeFlow

NOTE: to be merged with nobump.

Copy link
Member

@jgrandguillaume jgrandguillaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thx for the fix

Any change in the profiles is overridden when updating the module.
Also this trigger the recomputation of the buffer zones, as
they depend on buffer profile changes, this is unwanted.

CSV data does not support no-update tag so the date is converted to
xml.
@MiquelRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Travis error is unrelated to this PR, see #145.

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor Author

Travis error is now solved.

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-144-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 6c57722 into OCA:13.0 Jun 11, 2021
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 6c57722. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants