Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0] add compatibility with other report type in e-invoice #765

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[8.0] add compatibility with other report type in e-invoice #765

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@eLBati
Copy link
Member

eLBati commented Jan 3, 2019

Which report type for example?

@sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor Author

Which report type for example?

Aeroo

_inherit = "wizard.export.fatturapa"

@api.v8
def generate_attach_report(self, inv):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sergiocorato riesci a chiamare super in caso di report standard e chiamare questa nuova parte solo nel caso in cui serve? (evidenziando con dei commenti cosa cambia rispetto al metodo originale)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eLBati cosa dici della #780 ? sostituisce questa correggendo direttamente il modulo l10n_it_fatturapa_out, in alternativa c'è la #770 , aspettavo il test di @d-stragapede se risolve anche a lui

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sergiocorato se la #780 funziona in tutti i casi, penso sia la soluzione migliore

@sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor Author

chiusa a favore di #780 se copre anche la #770

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants