Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8.0 purchase request to rfq fix #241

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 1, 2016

Conversation

JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

Fixes singleton error due to bad use of api.multi in method _compute_has_purchase_request_lines

image

@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member Author

@JonathanNEMRY can you review plz and give your thumbs up?

@elicoidal
Copy link
Contributor

👍

3 similar comments
@JonathanNEMRY
Copy link

👍

@pabi2
Copy link

pabi2 commented Jul 1, 2016

👍

@kittiu
Copy link
Member

kittiu commented Jul 1, 2016

👍

@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member Author

This one is ready to merge.

@sbidoul sbidoul merged commit f1011ca into OCA:8.0 Jul 1, 2016
@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks to all!

AaronHForgeFlow pushed a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2016
…equest_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
JordiBForgeFlow added a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2016
…equest_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
AaronHForgeFlow pushed a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2016
…equest_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
adrienpeiffer pushed a commit to acsone/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2016
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
adrienpeiffer pushed a commit to acsone/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2016
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
adrienpeiffer pushed a commit to acsone/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2016
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
adrienpeiffer pushed a commit to acsone/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2016
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
sbidoul pushed a commit to acsone/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2017
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
sbidoul pushed a commit to acsone/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2017
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
JordiBForgeFlow added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2017
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (#241)
JordiBForgeFlow added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2017
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (#241)
rgarnau pushed a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2017
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
rgarnau pushed a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2017
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
HviorForgeFlow pushed a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2018
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
HviorForgeFlow pushed a commit to ForgeFlow/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2018
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
tschanzt pushed a commit to camptocamp/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request May 4, 2018
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
tschanzt pushed a commit to camptocamp/purchase-workflow that referenced this pull request May 4, 2018
…_lines due to wrong implementation with api.multi (OCA#241)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants