Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] fs_attachment: No db rules for storages not used as default for… #286

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

lmignon
Copy link
Contributor

@lmignon lmignon commented Oct 9, 2023

… attachement

@lmignon lmignon force-pushed the 16.0-fix-db-rules branch 2 times, most recently from 5cd3af6 to f990aed Compare October 9, 2023 09:12
wpichler and others added 3 commits October 9, 2023 11:38
…dav. It is not possible to specify a tuple in json
Add history for commit included from OCA#285 and the author to the contributors list
@lmignon
Copy link
Contributor Author

lmignon commented Oct 9, 2023

ping @qgroulard @marielejeune

@lmignon
Copy link
Contributor Author

lmignon commented Oct 9, 2023

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-286-by-lmignon-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 398d64f into OCA:16.0 Oct 9, 2023
5 of 7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 2ca222b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@lmignon lmignon deleted the 16.0-fix-db-rules branch October 9, 2023 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants