Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17.0][MIG] stock_picking_type_shipping_policy: Migration to 17.0 #922

Conversation

StefanRijnhart
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@StefanRijnhart StefanRijnhart added this to the 17.0 milestone Jul 18, 2024
@StefanRijnhart
Copy link
Member Author

/ocabot migration stock_picking_type_shipping_policy

Copy link
Contributor

@rousseldenis rousseldenis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review

Copy link
Contributor

@sebalix sebalix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG, should we squash the fixup that has been merged by mistake at the beginning?

grindtildeath and others added 22 commits September 30, 2024 17:02
... stock_picking_group_by_partner_by_carrier (of
OCA/stock-logistics-workflow).

In stock_picking_group_by_partner_by_carrier, the override of the method
_search_picking_for_assignation adds a domain on:

("move_type", "=", self.group_id.move_type)

(self is the move to assign in a picking).

When the move_type of the procurement group is "direct", the transfer is
normally created with the move_type "direct": when a first move is
assigned to a picking and none is found, it creates one with type
"direct", the second move should find the same and be assigned to it.

This is not what happens, with stock_picking_type_shipping_policy
configured to "force_all_product_ready", as it changes the way the first
stock.picking is created:

    def _get_new_picking_values(self):
        res = super()._get_new_picking_values()
        picking_type = self.mapped("picking_type_id")
        if picking_type.shipping_policy == "force_as_soon_as_possible":
            res["move_type"] = "direct"
        elif picking_type.shipping_policy == "force_all_products_ready":
            res["move_type"] = "one"
        return res

The first stock.picking is created with a move_type of "one", so when
the second move search a stock.picking, it can't find it as it looks for
a "direct" one.

This glue module changes the domain of the grouping to take into account the
picking type's shipping policy when both modules are installed.
Currently translated at 100.0% (4 of 4 strings)

Translation: wms-13.0/wms-13.0-stock_picking_type_shipping_policy
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/wms-13-0/wms-13-0-stock_picking_type_shipping_policy/es_MX/
Currently translated at 100.0% (4 of 4 strings)

Translation: wms-13.0/wms-13.0-stock_picking_type_shipping_policy
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/wms-13-0/wms-13-0-stock_picking_type_shipping_policy/es_AR/
@StefanRijnhart StefanRijnhart force-pushed the 17.0-mig-stock_picking_type_shipping_policy branch from 31cd667 to 8c02cdf Compare September 30, 2024 15:02
@StefanRijnhart
Copy link
Member Author

@sebalix done!

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@jbaudoux
Copy link
Contributor

jbaudoux commented Oct 4, 2024

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-922-by-jbaudoux-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 8ec2744 into OCA:17.0 Oct 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 7872f6a. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.